<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (4) TMI 1060 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176401</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the cross appeals regarding the addition of unutilized modvat credit for the assessment year 2004-05. It emphasized the need for adjustments in both opening and closing stock, following a previous case precedent. The Tribunal clarified that modvat credit does not constitute payment until set off against central excise liability. The matter was remanded to the AO for a fresh order to ensure no double deduction and grant the assessee a hearing opportunity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:28:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=410014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (4) TMI 1060 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176401</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the cross appeals regarding the addition of unutilized modvat credit for the assessment year 2004-05. It emphasized the need for adjustments in both opening and closing stock, following a previous case precedent. The Tribunal clarified that modvat credit does not constitute payment until set off against central excise liability. The matter was remanded to the AO for a fresh order to ensure no double deduction and grant the assessee a hearing opportunity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176401</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>