<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 33 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1599</link>
    <description>Products manufactured under a drug licence and shown by labels, technical material, trade literature and veterinary certification to have therapeutic or prophylactic use against ticks, fleas, lice, parasites and related skin ailments were classifiable as veterinary medicaments. The record did not support treatment of the goods as mere cleansing or toilet preparations, so classification under the medicament heading was upheld and the toilet preparation classification was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40999" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 33 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1599</link>
      <description>Products manufactured under a drug licence and shown by labels, technical material, trade literature and veterinary certification to have therapeutic or prophylactic use against ticks, fleas, lice, parasites and related skin ailments were classifiable as veterinary medicaments. The record did not support treatment of the goods as mere cleansing or toilet preparations, so classification under the medicament heading was upheld and the toilet preparation classification was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>