https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1598 The appellate authority rejected the importer's classification of goods as 'automatic data processing machines' under a specific heading, instead choosing a different heading with the same duty rate. The original authority was directed to reassess based on the new classification. The importer sought classification under Heading 84.71 for an imported machine, arguing it incorporated features of an automatic data processing machine. The impugned order was stayed pending appeal, emphasizing the need for meticulous classification and consideration of manufacturer's literature to potentially eliminate duty liability. en-us Thu, 31 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1598 The appellate authority rejected the importer's classification of goods as 'automatic data processing machines' under a specific heading, instead choosing a different heading with the same duty rate. The original authority was directed to reassess based on the new classification. The importer sought classification under Heading 84.71 for an imported machine, arguing it incorporated features of an automatic data processing machine. The impugned order was stayed pending appeal, emphasizing the need for meticulous classification and consideration of manufacturer's literature to potentially eliminate duty liability. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 31 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1598