<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1113 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269809</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee in a jurisdictional challenge under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was found that the DCIT, New Delhi lacked jurisdiction to reassess the assessee due to a change in the registered office to Bangalore, where subsequent assessments were conducted. Consequently, both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 06:10:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409975" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1113 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269809</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee in a jurisdictional challenge under section 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It was found that the DCIT, New Delhi lacked jurisdiction to reassess the assessee due to a change in the registered office to Bangalore, where subsequent assessments were conducted. Consequently, both the revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>