<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1110 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269806</link>
    <description>The court set aside penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the appellant&#039;s circumstances and belief in client exemption. However, the penalty under Section 70 for delayed filing was upheld at Rs. 4000, as relief under Section 80 applied only to other penalties. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partially successful, with penalties under Sections 77 and 78 being overturned while the penalty under Section 70 was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 10:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1110 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269806</link>
      <description>The court set aside penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the appellant&#039;s circumstances and belief in client exemption. However, the penalty under Section 70 for delayed filing was upheld at Rs. 4000, as relief under Section 80 applied only to other penalties. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partially successful, with penalties under Sections 77 and 78 being overturned while the penalty under Section 70 was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>