<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269801</link>
    <description>The Tribunal classified the services provided to DHL International as courier services, determined the assessable value based on the gross amount charged, imposed service tax on unbilled consignments, disallowed deductions for investment rebate and other charges, ruled that the services did not qualify as export services, upheld the extended limitation period for tax demand, imposed penalties for improper filing of returns but reduced penalties after allowing cum-tax benefit, and allowed the cum-tax benefit for services provided to DHLI. The Tribunal set aside the demand beyond the normal limitation period, reduced penalties under Section 78, and upheld penalties under Section 77.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 08:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269801</link>
      <description>The Tribunal classified the services provided to DHL International as courier services, determined the assessable value based on the gross amount charged, imposed service tax on unbilled consignments, disallowed deductions for investment rebate and other charges, ruled that the services did not qualify as export services, upheld the extended limitation period for tax demand, imposed penalties for improper filing of returns but reduced penalties after allowing cum-tax benefit, and allowed the cum-tax benefit for services provided to DHLI. The Tribunal set aside the demand beyond the normal limitation period, reduced penalties under Section 78, and upheld penalties under Section 77.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>