https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269798 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI on 19.11.2015. The appellant, a fireworks industry, sought cenvat credit for various services but failed to meet the criteria under Rule 2(1)(B) and Rule 2(1)(C) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The lower appellate authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the denial of credits on insurance services and services related to motor vehicles, imposing penalties. The appellant's non-appearance in hearings and improper claims led to the rejection of the appeal, emphasizing their ineligibility for certain credits. en-us Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269798 The appeal was dismissed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI on 19.11.2015. The appellant, a fireworks industry, sought cenvat credit for various services but failed to meet the criteria under Rule 2(1)(B) and Rule 2(1)(C) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The lower appellate authority and Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the denial of credits on insurance services and services related to motor vehicles, imposing penalties. The appellant's non-appearance in hearings and improper claims led to the rejection of the appeal, emphasizing their ineligibility for certain credits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269798