https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269797 The appeals were allowed solely for the purpose of re-quantifying duties and penalties. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating authority to address unresolved issues and make necessary adjustments in duty calculations and penalties based on a detailed examination of the case records. The Tribunal upheld that twisting Aluminium wire rods with steel wires constituted manufacturing under CETA 76.14, invoking the extended period for demand due to lack of intimation to the department by the appellants. The argument regarding non-supply of documents was dismissed as all necessary documents had been received by the appellants as per the CESTAT's order. en-us Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269797 The appeals were allowed solely for the purpose of re-quantifying duties and penalties. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating authority to address unresolved issues and make necessary adjustments in duty calculations and penalties based on a detailed examination of the case records. The Tribunal upheld that twisting Aluminium wire rods with steel wires constituted manufacturing under CETA 76.14, invoking the extended period for demand due to lack of intimation to the department by the appellants. The argument regarding non-supply of documents was dismissed as all necessary documents had been received by the appellants as per the CESTAT's order. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269797