<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1100 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269796</link>
    <description>Wrongful and premature availment of Cenvat credit can attract penalty even if the credit is later reversed with interest, because the rule contravention remains established. However, where suppression of facts with intent to evade duty is not shown, the penalty quantum may be interfered with and reduced. Penalty was therefore sustained in principle, but the amount was cut down to Rs. 1,50,000, and the order was modified to that limited extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 06:09:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1100 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269796</link>
      <description>Wrongful and premature availment of Cenvat credit can attract penalty even if the credit is later reversed with interest, because the rule contravention remains established. However, where suppression of facts with intent to evade duty is not shown, the penalty quantum may be interfered with and reduced. Penalty was therefore sustained in principle, but the amount was cut down to Rs. 1,50,000, and the order was modified to that limited extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>