https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269795 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to disallow cenvat credit on storage, warehousing, and insurance services for a manufacturing company. The Tribunal held that storage, warehousing, and insurance services qualified as eligible input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, citing precedent from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. The appellant was granted relief, and the judgment was issued on 13.11.2015. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Dec 2015 07:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269795 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision to disallow cenvat credit on storage, warehousing, and insurance services for a manufacturing company. The Tribunal held that storage, warehousing, and insurance services qualified as eligible input services under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, citing precedent from the High Court of Andhra Pradesh. The appellant was granted relief, and the judgment was issued on 13.11.2015. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269795