<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1095 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269791</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution due to repeated adjournments and non-appearance of the appellants. Applications for restoration and condonation of delay were rejected, citing significant delays and practical implications of the final order. The Tribunal emphasized the need for timely prosecution of appeals and the consequences of non-compliance with court orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 06:08:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1095 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269791</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of appeals for non-prosecution due to repeated adjournments and non-appearance of the appellants. Applications for restoration and condonation of delay were rejected, citing significant delays and practical implications of the final order. The Tribunal emphasized the need for timely prosecution of appeals and the consequences of non-compliance with court orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269791</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>