https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269783 The Court quashed the VATO's order for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-2010 under Section 36A(8) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, due to lack of jurisdiction as the Commissioner had not explicitly delegated powers to the VATO. The Court emphasized the necessity of explicit delegation under Section 68 of the Act for VATO to issue such orders, declaring the impugned order void. The writ petition was allowed, with parties bearing their respective costs. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Jan 2017 18:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269783 The Court quashed the VATO's order for the assessment years 2008-09 and 2009-2010 under Section 36A(8) of the Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004, due to lack of jurisdiction as the Commissioner had not explicitly delegated powers to the VATO. The Court emphasized the necessity of explicit delegation under Section 68 of the Act for VATO to issue such orders, declaring the impugned order void. The writ petition was allowed, with parties bearing their respective costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269783