<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1082 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269778</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the validity of additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The matter was remanded to the ITAT for a fresh examination of the relevant facts concerning the Assessee. The Assessee&#039;s challenge to the search and assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153A was not entertained due to lack of argument before the ITAT. The court emphasized the need for the ITAT to independently assess the facts of the Assessee&#039;s case rather than relying solely on precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409914" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1082 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269778</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the validity of additions under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The matter was remanded to the ITAT for a fresh examination of the relevant facts concerning the Assessee. The Assessee&#039;s challenge to the search and assumption of jurisdiction under Section 153A was not entertained due to lack of argument before the ITAT. The court emphasized the need for the ITAT to independently assess the facts of the Assessee&#039;s case rather than relying solely on precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269778</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>