<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1076 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269772</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustment under Chapter X of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to international transactions with associated enterprises, where arm&#039;s length price must be determined to prevent profit shifting. Transactions with independent third parties do not fall within that adjustment mechanism because they are outside the scope of AE dealings and do not raise the same tax-avoidance concern. Extending transfer pricing rules to non-AE transactions would enlarge income computation beyond Chapter X. The Bombay High Court accordingly held that the adjustment cannot be applied to transactions with unrelated parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2026 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409908" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1076 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269772</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustment under Chapter X of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to international transactions with associated enterprises, where arm&#039;s length price must be determined to prevent profit shifting. Transactions with independent third parties do not fall within that adjustment mechanism because they are outside the scope of AE dealings and do not raise the same tax-avoidance concern. Extending transfer pricing rules to non-AE transactions would enlarge income computation beyond Chapter X. The Bombay High Court accordingly held that the adjustment cannot be applied to transactions with unrelated parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>