<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1067 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269763</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the deletion of an addition to the closing stock valuation made by the Assessing Officer, based on the consistent application of the LIFO method by the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, supported by previous judgments emphasizing the importance of method consistency, was maintained. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, citing that no substantial question of law arose and referencing relevant case law to support the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 16:25:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409899" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1067 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269763</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the deletion of an addition to the closing stock valuation made by the Assessing Officer, based on the consistent application of the LIFO method by the assessee. The Tribunal&#039;s decision, supported by previous judgments emphasizing the importance of method consistency, was maintained. The Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, citing that no substantial question of law arose and referencing relevant case law to support the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269763</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>