<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1063 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269759</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding that payments to doctors were professional fees under Section 194J, not salaries under Section 192. It found no employer-employee relationship between the hospital and doctors, supporting the method of tax deduction. The court endorsed the CIT(A) and Tribunal&#039;s findings, stating the doctors operated independently and were not under the hospital&#039;s control in patient treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1063 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269759</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals, upholding that payments to doctors were professional fees under Section 194J, not salaries under Section 192. It found no employer-employee relationship between the hospital and doctors, supporting the method of tax deduction. The court endorsed the CIT(A) and Tribunal&#039;s findings, stating the doctors operated independently and were not under the hospital&#039;s control in patient treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>