<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269741</link>
    <description>Import of motor cars by hotels under the EPCG framework was examined against the actual user condition and export obligation requirements. The Tribunal&#039;s reasoning treated the policy and exemption notification harmoniously and held that, while the export obligation period was still running and the cars remained with the importer, immediate duty demand and penalties were premature. It also held that the cars were not required to be used only for transporting foreign tourists; compliance could be met through use in the hotel&#039;s service business and other modes of earning foreign exchange. The appeals succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1045 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269741</link>
      <description>Import of motor cars by hotels under the EPCG framework was examined against the actual user condition and export obligation requirements. The Tribunal&#039;s reasoning treated the policy and exemption notification harmoniously and held that, while the export obligation period was still running and the cars remained with the importer, immediate duty demand and penalties were premature. It also held that the cars were not required to be used only for transporting foreign tourists; compliance could be met through use in the hotel&#039;s service business and other modes of earning foreign exchange. The appeals succeeded and the impugned orders were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269741</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>