<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (9) TMI 959 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176389</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities to delete the addition of unexplained gifts made by the Assessing Officer. The Court emphasized the importance of documentary evidence establishing the genuineness of gifts and the creditworthiness of the donors. The Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found, and the findings of fact by the lower authorities were deemed conclusive and legally justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2017 13:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (9) TMI 959 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176389</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities to delete the addition of unexplained gifts made by the Assessing Officer. The Court emphasized the importance of documentary evidence establishing the genuineness of gifts and the creditworthiness of the donors. The Court dismissed the appeal as no substantial question of law was found, and the findings of fact by the lower authorities were deemed conclusive and legally justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>