<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1034 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269730</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the civil miscellaneous appeal, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order to reduce the deposit amount required for the appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding the detention of an export consignment. The Court emphasized maintaining fairness and balance in the proceedings by reducing the deposit amount to Rs. 5,00,000 within eight weeks for the appeal to be entertained and decided on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:37:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1034 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269730</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the civil miscellaneous appeal, modifying the Tribunal&#039;s order to reduce the deposit amount required for the appeal against the Commissioner&#039;s order regarding the detention of an export consignment. The Court emphasized maintaining fairness and balance in the proceedings by reducing the deposit amount to Rs. 5,00,000 within eight weeks for the appeal to be entertained and decided on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>