<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 650 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176386</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the valuation of the assessee&#039;s properties, stating that the acceptance of the assessee&#039;s valuation over the DVO&#039;s valuation was reasonable. The Court found that there was no substantial question of law raised in the appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 15:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 650 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176386</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the valuation of the assessee&#039;s properties, stating that the acceptance of the assessee&#039;s valuation over the DVO&#039;s valuation was reasonable. The Court found that there was no substantial question of law raised in the appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>