https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176377 Repeated non-compliance with statutory notices and failure to produce books, confirmations, or supporting material justified an ex parte assessment under section 144 and sustaining the section 68 additions. The Tribunal also refused admission of additional evidence because no sufficient cause was shown under Rule 29, and held that no denial of natural justice was made out. The set-off of brought forward losses was left to verification from the record, as the claim had not been made before the Assessing Officer. Interest under section 234B was sustained as mandatory once statutory conditions were satisfied. en-us Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Dec 2015 14:12:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176377 Repeated non-compliance with statutory notices and failure to produce books, confirmations, or supporting material justified an ex parte assessment under section 144 and sustaining the section 68 additions. The Tribunal also refused admission of additional evidence because no sufficient cause was shown under Rule 29, and held that no denial of natural justice was made out. The set-off of brought forward losses was left to verification from the record, as the claim had not been made before the Assessing Officer. Interest under section 234B was sustained as mandatory once statutory conditions were satisfied. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176377