<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1169 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176370</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, holding that the delay in filing the appeal should have been condoned, directing the CIT(A) to consider the appeal on its merits. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to adjust the advance tax and self-assessment tax from the PD account and recalculate the interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234A accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 12:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1169 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176370</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, holding that the delay in filing the appeal should have been condoned, directing the CIT(A) to consider the appeal on its merits. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to adjust the advance tax and self-assessment tax from the PD account and recalculate the interest under sections 234B, 234C, and 234A accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176370</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>