<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 602 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176351</link>
    <description>Disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act were not vitiated by breach of natural justice where repeated notice, disclosure of papers, extensions, and opportunities to defend and participate in inquiry were given, and no prejudice was shown. On the merits, written admissions, sworn statement, bank and departmental records, and witness testimony established use of forged challans and fraudulent routing of refunds through connected bank accounts; a later retraction, being belated and unsupported, did not displace the earlier admissions. The conduct was treated as other misconduct and professionally unbecoming, and the severest disciplinary sanction of permanent removal from membership was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2024 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 602 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176351</link>
      <description>Disciplinary proceedings under the Chartered Accountants Act were not vitiated by breach of natural justice where repeated notice, disclosure of papers, extensions, and opportunities to defend and participate in inquiry were given, and no prejudice was shown. On the merits, written admissions, sworn statement, bank and departmental records, and witness testimony established use of forged challans and fraudulent routing of refunds through connected bank accounts; a later retraction, being belated and unsupported, did not displace the earlier admissions. The conduct was treated as other misconduct and professionally unbecoming, and the severest disciplinary sanction of permanent removal from membership was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176351</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>