<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (12) TMI 1166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176332</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, classifying the income from the sale of shares as capital gains rather than business income. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s intent, consistency in accounting treatment, and the nature of transactions, which were deemed to be for investment purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of consistency and overturned the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2015 14:07:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (12) TMI 1166 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176332</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, classifying the income from the sale of shares as capital gains rather than business income. The decision was based on the assessee&#039;s intent, consistency in accounting treatment, and the nature of transactions, which were deemed to be for investment purposes. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of consistency and overturned the lower authorities&#039; orders, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176332</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>