<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1961 (8) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176331</link>
    <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of the Assam Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 concerning tea estates, ruling that it was valid and did not conflict with the Tea Act of 1953. The Act was found to comply with Article 31(2) of the Constitution by providing for compensation principles. Consequently, the petitions challenging the Act were dismissed, with costs awarded against the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:51:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1961 (8) TMI 39 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176331</link>
      <description>The court upheld the constitutionality of the Assam Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948 concerning tea estates, ruling that it was valid and did not conflict with the Tea Act of 1953. The Act was found to comply with Article 31(2) of the Constitution by providing for compensation principles. Consequently, the petitions challenging the Act were dismissed, with costs awarded against the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 1961 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>