<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 940 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessments under Section 153C were invalid due to the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, following precedents emphasizing the mandatory nature of this requirement. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the assessments were quashed, without delving deeply into the merits of the additions made on account of gifts received by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 31st May 2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2015 12:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409765" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 940 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessments under Section 153C were invalid due to the absence of recorded satisfaction by the Assessing Officer, following precedents emphasizing the mandatory nature of this requirement. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the assessments were quashed, without delving deeply into the merits of the additions made on account of gifts received by the assessee. The order was pronounced on 31st May 2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>