<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (5) TMI 950 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176318</link>
    <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment was based on a mere change of opinion and did not satisfy the statutory pre-conditions. The court quashed the impugned notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act and the assessment order dated March 27, 2015, following the same. The writ petition was allowed, and rule was made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409736" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (5) TMI 950 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176318</link>
      <description>The court held that the reopening of the assessment was based on a mere change of opinion and did not satisfy the statutory pre-conditions. The court quashed the impugned notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act and the assessment order dated March 27, 2015, following the same. The writ petition was allowed, and rule was made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a) with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>