<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 32 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1570</link>
    <description>A declaration filed in the statutory return format can amount to the written exercise of an exemption option where it clearly discloses reliance on a particular notification and is acted upon, and if that notification prohibits withdrawal during the financial year, the assessee cannot later switch to another exemption for the same period. The duty demand must then be recomputed by treating the sale price as cum-duty price and by verifying admissibility of Modvat credit for final quantification. Penalty under the Central Excise Rules may be reduced where the breach is established but the original penalty is considered excessive, with the minimum prescribed penalty applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 32 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1570</link>
      <description>A declaration filed in the statutory return format can amount to the written exercise of an exemption option where it clearly discloses reliance on a particular notification and is acted upon, and if that notification prohibits withdrawal during the financial year, the assessee cannot later switch to another exemption for the same period. The duty demand must then be recomputed by treating the sale price as cum-duty price and by verifying admissibility of Modvat credit for final quantification. Penalty under the Central Excise Rules may be reduced where the breach is established but the original penalty is considered excessive, with the minimum prescribed penalty applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>