<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 69 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand, confiscation, and penalties imposed on a 100% EOU for importing old and used Video Pan Cake tapes under duty exemption conditions. The appellant&#039;s challenge against testing by Doordarshan Kendra was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the failure to export goods made from the imported tapes. The penalty on the firm was consolidated to Rs. 2 lakhs, while the personal penalty on the proprietor was set aside. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partially allowed, affirming the impugned order with modified penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 69 - CESTAT,NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand, confiscation, and penalties imposed on a 100% EOU for importing old and used Video Pan Cake tapes under duty exemption conditions. The appellant&#039;s challenge against testing by Doordarshan Kendra was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing the failure to export goods made from the imported tapes. The penalty on the firm was consolidated to Rs. 2 lakhs, while the personal penalty on the proprietor was set aside. The appellant&#039;s appeal was partially allowed, affirming the impugned order with modified penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>