<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1021 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269717</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the disallowance amount under section 14A of the IT Act, 1961 r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the IT Rules to Rs. 18,90,931. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the adequacy of own funds for investments and required the AO to be unsatisfied with the expenditure claim before applying disallowance rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 20:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1021 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269717</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to limit the disallowance amount under section 14A of the IT Act, 1961 r.w. Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the IT Rules to Rs. 18,90,931. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the adequacy of own funds for investments and required the AO to be unsatisfied with the expenditure claim before applying disallowance rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>