https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269699 The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty on intermingled petroleum products classified as MS, ruling in favor of the appellant, a PSU. The appellant successfully argued that duty should be paid based on the applicable rate at the time of removal and presented evidence of the intermingled products meeting HSD specifications. The Tribunal noted industry practices and BIS standards supporting the appellant's position, ultimately concluding that the duty was correctly paid after downgrading the intermingled products to HSD. The appeal was allowed, and the demand for differential duty and penalty were overturned. en-us Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 May 2016 15:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269699 The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty on intermingled petroleum products classified as MS, ruling in favor of the appellant, a PSU. The appellant successfully argued that duty should be paid based on the applicable rate at the time of removal and presented evidence of the intermingled products meeting HSD specifications. The Tribunal noted industry practices and BIS standards supporting the appellant's position, ultimately concluding that the duty was correctly paid after downgrading the intermingled products to HSD. The appeal was allowed, and the demand for differential duty and penalty were overturned. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 24 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269699