<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1065 - Central Information Commission</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176291</link>
    <description>The Central Information Commission allowed the Second Appeal, directing the respondents to provide the requested information within 30 days. The decision emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability under the RTI Act, 2005, stating that the Appellant had been deprived of the Act&#039;s benefits. The Commission held that the plea under Section 24 of the Act was not applicable, and the information sought did not impede an ongoing investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1065 - Central Information Commission</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176291</link>
      <description>The Central Information Commission allowed the Second Appeal, directing the respondents to provide the requested information within 30 days. The decision emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability under the RTI Act, 2005, stating that the Appellant had been deprived of the Act&#039;s benefits. The Commission held that the plea under Section 24 of the Act was not applicable, and the information sought did not impede an ongoing investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>