https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176289 The Commission initiated an inquiry under Sections 18 and 20 of the RTI Act, 2005, due to the failure to provide information in response to an RTI application. The Deputy Commissioner only addressed one issue out of eight, stating the others were not under their purview. Lack of records of First Appeal and First Appellate Authority orders raised concerns. The complainant filed a complaint, leading to the Commission directing a Joint Secretary to conduct an inquiry and submit a report within four weeks. The judgment emphasized transparency, proper handling of requests, and accountability under the RTI Act for promoting good governance and access to information. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:55:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176289 The Commission initiated an inquiry under Sections 18 and 20 of the RTI Act, 2005, due to the failure to provide information in response to an RTI application. The Deputy Commissioner only addressed one issue out of eight, stating the others were not under their purview. Lack of records of First Appeal and First Appellate Authority orders raised concerns. The complainant filed a complaint, leading to the Commission directing a Joint Secretary to conduct an inquiry and submit a report within four weeks. The judgment emphasized transparency, proper handling of requests, and accountability under the RTI Act for promoting good governance and access to information. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Apr 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176289