<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (9) TMI 992 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176286</link>
    <description>Coal block allocation challenges were discussed in terms of whether separate individual hearings were needed before cancellation and whether a compensatory levy could be imposed. The text explains that class-wide hearing through associations and affected States was treated as sufficient in the circumstances, and that reopening individual allotments through a committee would amount to collateral reconsideration. It also notes that allocations made through the Screening Committee route and Government dispensation route were treated as illegal and arbitrary, with only specified public sector and UMPP allotments retained, while a compensatory levy was upheld as a reasonable estimate of loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:55:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (9) TMI 992 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176286</link>
      <description>Coal block allocation challenges were discussed in terms of whether separate individual hearings were needed before cancellation and whether a compensatory levy could be imposed. The text explains that class-wide hearing through associations and affected States was treated as sufficient in the circumstances, and that reopening individual allotments through a committee would amount to collateral reconsideration. It also notes that allocations made through the Screening Committee route and Government dispensation route were treated as illegal and arbitrary, with only specified public sector and UMPP allotments retained, while a compensatory levy was upheld as a reasonable estimate of loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>