https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176282 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Patna High Court's order and remitting the matter back to the High Court for a decision on merits. The Court held that the writ petition should not have been dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction, as a part of the cause of action did arise within the jurisdiction of the Patna High Court. The interim order directing the payment of Rs. 2.75 lakhs to the appellant was also noted, emphasizing that the respondents had participated in the proceedings without initially raising the jurisdictional objection. en-us Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:55:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176282 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Patna High Court's order and remitting the matter back to the High Court for a decision on merits. The Court held that the writ petition should not have been dismissed for want of territorial jurisdiction, as a part of the cause of action did arise within the jurisdiction of the Patna High Court. The interim order directing the payment of Rs. 2.75 lakhs to the appellant was also noted, emphasizing that the respondents had participated in the proceedings without initially raising the jurisdictional objection. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176282