<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176296</link>
    <description>The court upheld the judgments of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in a case involving the rejection of books of accounts for the assessment year 2000-01. The court found that the rejection based on electricity consumption discrepancies was not justified as no incriminating material was found during the search action. The court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that the findings did not raise any substantial question of law. The appellant&#039;s arguments were deemed to lack merit, and the decisions of the lower authorities were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1199 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176296</link>
      <description>The court upheld the judgments of the Tribunal and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in a case involving the rejection of books of accounts for the assessment year 2000-01. The court found that the rejection based on electricity consumption discrepancies was not justified as no incriminating material was found during the search action. The court dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that the findings did not raise any substantial question of law. The appellant&#039;s arguments were deemed to lack merit, and the decisions of the lower authorities were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>