<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (8) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1558</link>
    <description>SC held that the assessee satisfied both conditions of item 1 of Notification No. 14/2002-CE: duty on yarn was paid before clearance of grey fabric and CENVAT credit taken on the input was reversed before utilization, effectively meaning no credit was availed. Consequently the exemption at nil rate applied to the grey fabric and the Department&#039;s demand for differential duty was rejected. The civil appeal by the Department was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40965" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (8) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1558</link>
      <description>SC held that the assessee satisfied both conditions of item 1 of Notification No. 14/2002-CE: duty on yarn was paid before clearance of grey fabric and CENVAT credit taken on the input was reversed before utilization, effectively meaning no credit was availed. Consequently the exemption at nil rate applied to the grey fabric and the Department&#039;s demand for differential duty was rejected. The civil appeal by the Department was dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1558</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>