https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176304 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI quashed the impugned order forfeiting part of the security deposit of the appellant for alleged violations of Customs House Agents Licensing Regulation, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that Custom House Agents are not obligated to verify educational qualifications of their employees and that the supervision requirement under Regulation 19(8) does not extend to verifying such qualifications. The decision drew from a similar case, Trade Wings Ltd. v. CC, New Delhi, highlighting the lack of obligation for CHAs to verify educational qualifications, resulting in the unsustainable nature of the impugned order. en-us Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 19:55:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176304 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI quashed the impugned order forfeiting part of the security deposit of the appellant for alleged violations of Customs House Agents Licensing Regulation, 2004. The Tribunal emphasized that Custom House Agents are not obligated to verify educational qualifications of their employees and that the supervision requirement under Regulation 19(8) does not extend to verifying such qualifications. The decision drew from a similar case, Trade Wings Ltd. v. CC, New Delhi, highlighting the lack of obligation for CHAs to verify educational qualifications, resulting in the unsustainable nature of the impugned order. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176304