<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 999 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176278</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee against the revision order of CIT-XVII, Kolkata under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was found that the CIT failed to demonstrate that the original assessment order was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of errors in the assessment order being both present and prejudicial for a valid revision under Section 263, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2017 10:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 999 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176278</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee against the revision order of CIT-XVII, Kolkata under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It was found that the CIT failed to demonstrate that the original assessment order was both erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of errors in the assessment order being both present and prejudicial for a valid revision under Section 263, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>