https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176276 The Supreme Court held that defendants 1 to 11 were not validly appointed trustees under the trust deed and ordered their removal from managing trust properties. They were directed to account for their administration and pay costs to the plaintiffs. The Court set aside the decree against defendants 12 to 17, as no relief was sought against them. New trustees were to be appointed for trust administration, as most original trustees were deceased or unable to continue. Appeals were allowed. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:06:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176276 The Supreme Court held that defendants 1 to 11 were not validly appointed trustees under the trust deed and ordered their removal from managing trust properties. They were directed to account for their administration and pay costs to the plaintiffs. The Court set aside the decree against defendants 12 to 17, as no relief was sought against them. New trustees were to be appointed for trust administration, as most original trustees were deceased or unable to continue. Appeals were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Aug 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176276