<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1012 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176266</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining they were not classified as job workers under Rule 10A of Central Excise Valuation Rules. The duty demands and penalties imposed were found unjustified, leading to the waiver of the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal. The recovery of the demanded duty, interest, and penalties was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 13:28:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1012 - CESTAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176266</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, determining they were not classified as job workers under Rule 10A of Central Excise Valuation Rules. The duty demands and penalties imposed were found unjustified, leading to the waiver of the pre-deposit requirement for the appeal. The recovery of the demanded duty, interest, and penalties was stayed pending appeal disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176266</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>