https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176261 Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 requires the High Court to apply its mind when considering leave to appeal against acquittal and to record at least brief reasons for granting or refusing leave. A bare or cryptic refusal of leave is unsustainable because it hides the basis of the decision, prevents effective appellate scrutiny, and undermines fairness and transparency. The Court held that a reasoned order is necessary in such applications, and a non-speaking refusal is liable to be set aside. en-us Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Dec 2015 17:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176261 Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 requires the High Court to apply its mind when considering leave to appeal against acquittal and to record at least brief reasons for granting or refusing leave. A bare or cryptic refusal of leave is unsustainable because it hides the basis of the decision, prevents effective appellate scrutiny, and undermines fairness and transparency. The Court held that a reasoned order is necessary in such applications, and a non-speaking refusal is liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176261