https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176256 The CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the proportionate costs of composite material do not form part of the transactional value. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on a previous order in the appellant's case. en-us Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:31:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176256 The CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the proportionate costs of composite material do not form part of the transactional value. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed based on a previous order in the appellant's case. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176256