https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176255 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the appellant's appeal against the demand for the payment of a differential duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's argument that duty demand on two cars earmarked for scrapping was unjustified was rejected. The Tribunal found that the duty was justifiable based on the value of the cars at clearance, including those designated for scrapping. The decision was pronounced on 28-10-2009. en-us Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Dec 2015 10:25:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176255 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision, dismissing the appellant's appeal against the demand for the payment of a differential duty under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The appellant's argument that duty demand on two cars earmarked for scrapping was unjustified was rejected. The Tribunal found that the duty was justifiable based on the value of the cars at clearance, including those designated for scrapping. The decision was pronounced on 28-10-2009. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176255