<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 966 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing adjustments in Transfer Pricing for Investment Advisory Services by excluding certain comparables, computing deductions under Section 10A including telecommunication expenses, allowing ESOP costs, permitting charges paid to stock exchanges, and reconsidering non-allowance of bonus expenses. The Tribunal also deleted the addition on account of differences in payments to AEBC, emphasizing accurate assessments based on credible information.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 11:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 966 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing adjustments in Transfer Pricing for Investment Advisory Services by excluding certain comparables, computing deductions under Section 10A including telecommunication expenses, allowing ESOP costs, permitting charges paid to stock exchanges, and reconsidering non-allowance of bonus expenses. The Tribunal also deleted the addition on account of differences in payments to AEBC, emphasizing accurate assessments based on credible information.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>