<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 963 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269659</link>
    <description>In both the quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings appeals, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The tribunal found the deductions allowed were justified and there was no deliberate concealment in the claimed expenses, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:51:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409527" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 963 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269659</link>
      <description>In both the quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings appeals, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Lucknow dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions. The tribunal found the deductions allowed were justified and there was no deliberate concealment in the claimed expenses, leading to the cancellation of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>