https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269640 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the admission of additional evidence, including complaints, reports, and judgments, in the appeals. This decision followed directions from the High Court and Supreme Court for a fresh examination of the case. The Tribunal considered the relevance of the evidence and jurisdictional issues, ultimately fixing a date for the appeal hearing. The debate also addressed the distinction between criminal proceedings and taxation matters, emphasizing the level of proof required. The decision to admit additional evidence was based on the nature of the documents and higher court directives, ensuring a comprehensive review of the case. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 17 Dec 2015 23:00:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269640 The Appellate Tribunal allowed the admission of additional evidence, including complaints, reports, and judgments, in the appeals. This decision followed directions from the High Court and Supreme Court for a fresh examination of the case. The Tribunal considered the relevance of the evidence and jurisdictional issues, ultimately fixing a date for the appeal hearing. The debate also addressed the distinction between criminal proceedings and taxation matters, emphasizing the level of proof required. The decision to admit additional evidence was based on the nature of the documents and higher court directives, ensuring a comprehensive review of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269640