<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 942 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269638</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the decision to disallow the appellant&#039;s suo-moto credit of &amp;amp;8377; 26 Crores, citing Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Section 11A (i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The penalty imposed was reduced from &amp;amp;8377; 7 Crore to &amp;amp;8377; 10,00,000, while interest demand was set aside. The tribunal emphasized the need for following statutory refund procedures and obtaining departmental sanction for correcting accounts, in line with legal principles established in relevant case laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2017 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 942 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269638</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD upheld the decision to disallow the appellant&#039;s suo-moto credit of &amp;amp;8377; 26 Crores, citing Rule 14 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and Section 11A (i) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The penalty imposed was reduced from &amp;amp;8377; 7 Crore to &amp;amp;8377; 10,00,000, while interest demand was set aside. The tribunal emphasized the need for following statutory refund procedures and obtaining departmental sanction for correcting accounts, in line with legal principles established in relevant case laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>