https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269629 The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not entitled to Cenvat Credit benefits for supplies made to contractors, directing a pre-deposit of the disputed amount. The appellant must make a pre-deposit of &8377; 4.89 lakhs, with compliance resulting in the waiver of the balance dues, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. The judgment clarified entitlement to Cenvat Credit benefits for supplies to co-developers and contractors under the SEZ Act and Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing adherence to specific legal provisions and procedural fairness. en-us Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269629 The Tribunal ruled that the appellant was not entitled to Cenvat Credit benefits for supplies made to contractors, directing a pre-deposit of the disputed amount. The appellant must make a pre-deposit of &8377; 4.89 lakhs, with compliance resulting in the waiver of the balance dues, and recovery stayed during the appeal's pendency. The judgment clarified entitlement to Cenvat Credit benefits for supplies to co-developers and contractors under the SEZ Act and Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing adherence to specific legal provisions and procedural fairness. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 03 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269629