<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 929 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269625</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the adjustment of the deposited sum against the estimated differential duty, resulting in the release of goods detained despite compliance with provisional release conditions. The court emphasized that the deposited amount could not be appropriated until adjudication post the show cause notice, ordering the release of goods within ten days if all conditions were fulfilled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 11:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=409493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 929 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269625</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petition, directing the adjustment of the deposited sum against the estimated differential duty, resulting in the release of goods detained despite compliance with provisional release conditions. The court emphasized that the deposited amount could not be appropriated until adjudication post the show cause notice, ordering the release of goods within ten days if all conditions were fulfilled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269625</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>